<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lab Rat or Button Monkey? &#187; screening</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/tag/screening/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk</link>
	<description>Under the white coat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 20:10:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Chlamydia screening promotion problems UPDATE</title>
		<link>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2009/10/20/chlamydia-screening-promotion-problems-update/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2009/10/20/chlamydia-screening-promotion-problems-update/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:58:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dapo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chlamydia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/?p=155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On my way home last night, I saw an advert for the National Chlamydia Screening Programme on a bus shelter.  It seems my concerns about the message not being spread is not really valid after all.  Hope the advert is a success!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On my way home last night, I saw an advert for the <a href="http://www.chlamydiascreening.nhs.uk/">National Chlamydia Screening Programme</a> on a bus shelter.  It seems my concerns about the message not being spread is not really valid after all.  Hope the advert is a success!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2009/10/20/chlamydia-screening-promotion-problems-update/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chlamydia screening promotion problems</title>
		<link>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2009/10/18/chlamydia-screening-promotion-problems/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2009/10/18/chlamydia-screening-promotion-problems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:36:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dapo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Good sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medical]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chlamydia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[screening]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/?p=144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw a worrying story on the BBC health site today. It concerns chlamydia screening in the UK.   It seems the story is based on some research which can be found here.  A provional PDF of the research can be found here (Note this link may break in the future).  As the BBC article points out, chlamydia [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw a worrying <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8309436.stm">story</a> on the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk">BBC</a> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health">health</a> site today. It concerns chlamydia screening in the UK.   It seems the story is based on some research which can be found <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/9/383/abstract">here</a>.  A provional PDF of the research can be found <a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/pdf/1471-2458-9-383.pdf">here</a> (Note this link may break in the future).  As the BBC article points out, chlamydia is a &#8220;silent infection&#8221;.  You do not get any obvious signs of having caught the infection.  With current <a href="http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=412">rates are rising</a> you would like to hope that promoting screening would be a higher proirity.    It still seems that some things are still taboo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2009/10/18/chlamydia-screening-promotion-problems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
