<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lab Rat or Button Monkey? &#187; medical risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/tag/medical-risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk</link>
	<description>Under the white coat</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:16:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Medical abbreviations &#8216;pose risk&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2008/03/21/medical-abbreviations-pose-risk/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2008/03/21/medical-abbreviations-pose-risk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 09:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dapo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Talking point]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abbreviations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical risk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2008/03/21/medical-abbreviations-pose-risk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I saw this page on the BBC Health page.  It suggests that the use of abbreviations should be potentially phased out as it has contributed to 5% of errors in an American study, some of which were fatal.  An example quoted in the article concerns the dose of insulin given to a patient.  The notes [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7171453.stm">this page </a>on the BBC Health page.  It suggests that the use of abbreviations should be potentially phased out as it has contributed to 5% of errors in an American study, some of which were fatal.  An example quoted in the article concerns the dose of insulin given to a patient.  The notes had 6IU, which was interpretated as 61 units and not the actual 6 International Units.  It does make for some interesting reading.</p>
<p> <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7171453.stm">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/7171453.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.biomedicalscience.org.uk/2008/03/21/medical-abbreviations-pose-risk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

